Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
PortElliot2.jpg
'An aphorism, properly stamped and molded, has not been "deciphered" when it has simply been read; rather one has then to begin its interpretation, for which is required an art of interpretation.' -- Nietzsche, 'On the Genealogy of Morals'
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Weblog Links
Library
Fields
Philosophers
Writers
Connections
Magazines
E-Resources
Academics
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'An aphorism, properly stamped and molded, has not been "deciphered" when it has simply been read; rather one has then to begin its interpretation, for which is required an art of interpretation.' -- Nietzsche, 'On the Genealogy of Morals'

machine culture « Previous | |Next »
May 30, 2007

An interesting paragraph:

We are early 21st-century humanity, the inheritors of industrialism, the progenitors of the information age. We live in a machine culture; in our daily lives, we are more and more surrounded by and interfaced with machines. We are no longer, like our ancestors, simply supplied by machines; we live in and through them. From our workplaces to our errands about town to our leisure time at home, human experience is to an unprecedented extent the experience of being interfaced with the machine, of imbibing its logic, of being surrounded by it and seeking it out: pager, cell
phone.

It is by Phoebe Sengers in a paper entitled Practices for a Machine Culture, and she goes on to say that in a world where machinery is woven in to the fabric of our daily lives, it is, while useful, not enough to approach computation at an arm’s length, to make it the object or pre-given tool of the humanities. The humanities must not only observe, use, and critique computation, but also ingest it. Computing itself must become a humanist discipline.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 4:51 PM | | Comments (3)
Comments

Comments

Interesting questions. The logic of domination (as Adorno said) is complicit with the logic of technology. Both the east and west (soviets and americans) converged in their fetishizing of industry, technology, and science. The situation today is even more acute than an Adorno imagined.....and the old marxist concept of reification exists squared. WE treat our friends like machines and our machines like friends.

and gary....here is the link to Placebo Art...http://www.bestcyrano.org/voxpop/
where, a couple posts back the discussion regarding death of literature is discussed....and which, oddly (or not) leads to more recent postings about this logic of machine culture.

Just to add to John's point, I think that Heidegger's idea of technological enframing - wherein domination can be seen as the increasing hold of metaphysics (which in our era manifests itself technologically) - provides a little room for optimism. For Heidegger, it is the completion of the totalizing hold of metaphysics that allows one to view it as such and see beyond it to alternative possible horizons. In this way, I suppose there is a little of Marx to him (I am thinking of the communist manifesto, but only thematically, not analytically).