Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
PortElliot2.jpg
'An aphorism, properly stamped and molded, has not been "deciphered" when it has simply been read; rather one has then to begin its interpretation, for which is required an art of interpretation.' -- Nietzsche, 'On the Genealogy of Morals'
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Weblog Links
Library
Fields
Philosophers
Writers
Connections
Magazines
E-Resources
Academics
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'An aphorism, properly stamped and molded, has not been "deciphered" when it has simply been read; rather one has then to begin its interpretation, for which is required an art of interpretation.' -- Nietzsche, 'On the Genealogy of Morals'

image as capital « Previous | |Next »
April 27, 2007

In The Cultural Turn: Selected Writings on the Postmodern, 1983-1998 Frederic Jameson interprets the visual, or the "image" in Guy Debord's sense of "the final form of commodity reification" as follows:

The image is the commodity today, and that is why it is vain to expect a negation of the logic of commodity production from it, that is why, finally, all beauty today is meretricious and the appeal to it by contemporary pseudo-aestheticism is an ideological maneuver and not a creative resource.

I would like to explore this by turning to Jonathan Beller's The Cinematic Mode of Production: Attention Economy and the Society of the Spectacle, a Marxist analysis of cinema as a mode of production in what many call “post-industrial” capitalism. Beller's argument is that cinematic images are not just representations of capital, but that they actually are capital.

I have briefly looked at the Introduction to the Cinematic Mode of Production over at junk for code (here and here) but the text deserves a closer look in terms of the subject

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 5:26 PM |