Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
PortElliot2.jpg
'An aphorism, properly stamped and molded, has not been "deciphered" when it has simply been read; rather one has then to begin its interpretation, for which is required an art of interpretation.' -- Nietzsche, 'On the Genealogy of Morals'
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Weblog Links
Library
Fields
Philosophers
Writers
Connections
Magazines
E-Resources
Academics
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'An aphorism, properly stamped and molded, has not been "deciphered" when it has simply been read; rather one has then to begin its interpretation, for which is required an art of interpretation.' -- Nietzsche, 'On the Genealogy of Morals'

Adorno: 'Mimesis and Rationality' « Previous | |Next »
February 14, 2007

In the light of this earlier post on Adorno, Art and Mimesis I've started re-reading the sections on art and mimesis in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory. The opening paragraph in a section entitled 'Mimesis and Rationality' is an interesting one. Adorno writes:

Art is a refugee for mimetic behaviour. In art the subject, depending on how much autonomy it has, takes up various positions vis-a-vis its objective other from which it is always different but never entirely separate. Art's disavowal of magical practices---art's own antecendents---signifes that art shares in rationality. Its ability to hold its own in the midst of rationality, even while using the meqans of that rationality, is a response to the evils and irrationality of the rational bureaucratic world.

I was suprised by the art standing in opposition to the bureaucratic world as distinct from the capitalist market or the culture industry. Is this the Webern strand of Adorno coming to the fore?

Adorno continues:

The end of all rationality viewed as the sum total of all pactical means would have to be something other than a means, hence a non-rationality quality. Capitalist society hides and disavows precisely this irrationality, whereas art does not. It represents truth in the two fold sense of preserving the image of an end smothered completely by irrationality and of exposing the irrationality and absurdity of the status quo.

Does the phrase 'the image of an end smothered completely by irrationality' refer to the incapacity of instrumental reason to talk in terms of the ethical ends of human action--eg., the image of the good life?

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 11:11 PM |