Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
PortElliot2.jpg
'An aphorism, properly stamped and molded, has not been "deciphered" when it has simply been read; rather one has then to begin its interpretation, for which is required an art of interpretation.' -- Nietzsche, 'On the Genealogy of Morals'
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Weblog Links
Library
Fields
Philosophers
Writers
Connections
Magazines
E-Resources
Academics
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'An aphorism, properly stamped and molded, has not been "deciphered" when it has simply been read; rather one has then to begin its interpretation, for which is required an art of interpretation.' -- Nietzsche, 'On the Genealogy of Morals'

the university is finished « Previous | |Next »
October 23, 2005

Lars decribes the changes to universities under a neo-liberal mode of governance so well:

The university is over, everyone agrees with that. The dream is over, the university is finished, everyone says the same thing. There are no universities; there are money making machines, that is true, but no universities. There are no universities, and there are no students, that's clear enough. There are units of resource, but no students. And there are no lecturers. True, there are still some old professors, still a few left, but there are no lecturers. No one teaches. There is no teaching, just as there is no reading. Students don't read, staff don't read, no one reads, the university is finished.

The consequences?:
There is no Philosophy, not any more. There's no English Literature, not any more. True, there are professors of Philosophy and professors of English Literature, there are still a few people who remember how it was when there were universities, but they are coming up to retirement. There are a few professors around, but the university is keen to pension them off, to get rid of them, so the takeover can complete itself.


| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 11:52 PM | | Comments (4)
Comments

Comments

I sort of agree with this, though I would say the madness and hysteria of the modern university is due to a statist Power as well as to a type of hyper-technological capitalism; humans, in low-cyberpunk fashion, are meshing with their machines, with their preferred products, with their computers, movies, automobiles, etc. Spend a few days at a UC or Cal State and mingle with "students": narcissism would seem to be operative term, as well as hedonism, a type of individualism fueled by pop culture and technology and, I would assert, a type of porno-consciousness. Machiavelli in the Silicon Valley or something. The New Left of the 60s and 70s was partly responsible for all of this, or the bourgeois liberalism was. The New Left hedonism merged with the Reaganite individualism, the militarism, and created this sort of superficially PC hipster, who perhaps recycles and does java code and then heads to the strip club in the evening with her homies.

This is something which has been a hot issue for debate for quite some time now (when I posted something similar a short while back, it received more comments than any other post on my blog to date).

I have to agree with Lars. Not "sort of agree" like the reader above, but agree wholeheartedly. As a current student in the Univeristy system, I can say little thought is given to "Learning", the original function of a university.

Want a prime example? The CEI. I go to UniSA, and at the end of every subject I complete, I have to fill out an online questionnaire called the Course Evaluation Instrument (CEI) - I even filled out three just today, considering I'm nearing the end of my degree (a Masters in Business Info Sys, if you're interested).

Anyway, the questions in the CEI are answered on a sliding scale of "Strongly Agree" to "Strongly Disagree". The questions revolve around, "Was the lecturer helpful?" and "Was the course outline clear?" etc... but as a lecturer once pointed out to me, there are no questions about, "Did you learn anything?"

If it can't be quantified, measured, and costed, it is disregarded.

In my whole time at Uni (including Masters), I have only ever done three courses I can actually say, "yes, this course made me think, made me re-evaluate myself, and taught me something". But who cares? The Uni doesn't want to know that.

As an aside, two of the three courses I liked - revolving around the ethical and philosophical implications of IT - are planning to be scrapped because "the Uni can't see the value in them".

Universities are most definately dead.

-reverendtimothy

MT,
You seem to talking about the politicization of the university by the New Left in the 1970s and 1980s.

The neoliberal reforms to the university to make them more corporate and to function as businesses as pushed the old lefties to one side.

The statist power --ie very tight governance, regulation and control--has long been a feature of the liberal state in Australia. It is this that acts a constraint on the shift to the market.

Hence there is a contradiction at the heart of the neoliberal reforms--deregulation and ministerial control

RT,
I've read your post and comments and they concur with what Lars has written.

Goodbye university hello degree factory. Welcome to the educational institute where few students learn anything or how to think critically.

On the other hand, one can ask:'Was Uni of SA ever a university? It was originally a tech college with little by way of a research culture.