Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
PortElliot2.jpg
'An aphorism, properly stamped and molded, has not been "deciphered" when it has simply been read; rather one has then to begin its interpretation, for which is required an art of interpretation.' -- Nietzsche, 'On the Genealogy of Morals'
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Weblog Links
Library
Fields
Philosophers
Writers
Connections
Magazines
E-Resources
Academics
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'An aphorism, properly stamped and molded, has not been "deciphered" when it has simply been read; rather one has then to begin its interpretation, for which is required an art of interpretation.' -- Nietzsche, 'On the Genealogy of Morals'

Heidegger and Benjamin « Previous | |Next »
May 2, 2004

Gary, I have quite a few questions and points for discussion but before I turn to them, I’d very much like you to answer the following question for me. Benjamin thought that the solution to the problem of the inadequate subject-object metaphysics was to return to Kant. In his words, Kant’s system, ‘by virtue of its brilliant exploration of the certainty and justification of knowledge, derived and developed a depth that will prove adequate for a new and higher kind of experience that is yet to come’. Where does Heidegger stand on Kant?

| Posted by at 5:40 PM | | Comments (1)
Comments

Comments

Trevor,
two pathway are suggested in the previous posts.

1... a shift away from knowledge to being

2. a shift away from theoretical knowledge of science in the Critique of Pure Reason to a tacit embodied knowledge of eveyday life.

It is a going back to, and a reworking of Aristotle, in order to destruct modern philosophy. Of course , you can argue that Kant was making similar but more hesitant moves in the Critique of Judgement.